Cases 11 - 16 of 16
BOARD OF THE INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTER NATIONAL 401(k) PLAN AND JOHN MURPHY AND JOSH FRANK ITS CO CHAIRMAN v. BEDFORD STUYVESANT RESTORATION
as 1:2013cv00741
Plaintiff:
BOARD OF THE INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTER NATIONAL 401(k) PLAN AND JOHN MURPHY AND JOSH FRANK ITS CO CHAIRMAN
Defendant:
BEDFORD STUYVESANT RESTORATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
FOX et al v. MCCORMICK et al
as 1:2012cv01869
Plaintiff:
ROBERT FOX, JR. , JAMES MCLAUGHLIN , FINN PETTE and others
Defendant:
ROBERT MCCORMICK, NOEL C. BORCK, PAUL O. GEHL and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
MURPHY et al v. SHEET METAL WORKERS' INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION et al
as 1:2010cv01194
Plaintiff:
DAVID M. MURPHY , LUTHER P. KING, JR. and CORNELIUS M. ENGLISH, JR.
Defendant:
SHEET METAL WORKERS' INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION, MICHAEL SULLIVAN, SHEET METAL, AIR, RAIL AND TRANSPORTATION WORKERS and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0401
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS NATIONAL 401(k) SAVINGS PLAN et al v. SHELDON CONSTRUCTION, INC. et al
as 1:2010cv00106
Plaintiff:
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS NATIONAL 401(k) SAVINGS PLAN, JOHN MURPHY and HAROLD D. MARSHALL
Defendant:
SHELDON CONSTRUCTION, INC. and LEE M. SHELDON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Pablo Figueroa, et al v. DC Metropolitan Police Dept.
as 09-7133
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Pablo Figueroa, Michael J. Farish, Brian A. Murphy and others
Defendant - Appellee:
District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department
FIGUEROA et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
as 1:2007cv01992
Plaintiff:
PABLO FIGUEROA, MICHAEL J. FARISH, BRIAN A. MURPHY and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
