Cases 1 - 6 of 6
BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES DIVISION/IBT v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
as 1:2020cv00844
Plaintiff:
BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES DIVISION/IBT
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION and NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION doing business as AMTRAK
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 2
BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES DIVISION/IBT v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
as 1:2020cv00791
Plaintiff:
BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES DIVISION/IBT
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION and NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION doing business as AMTRAK
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 2
BROTHERHOOD OF RAILROAD SIGNALMEN v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
as 1:2019cv03615
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION and NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION a D.C. corporation doing business as AMTRAK
Plaintiff:
BROTHERHOOD OF RAILROAD SIGNALMEN
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
National Railroad Passenger C v. Fraternal Order of Police, et al
as 16-7004
Plaintiff - Appellee:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation, doing business as Amtrak, also known as Chicago Union Station Company, also known as Passenger Railroad Insurance Limited, also known as Penn Station Leasing, LLC, also known as Washington Terminal Company, also kn
Defendant - Appellant:
Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge 189 Labor Committee
Defendant - Appellee:
Sarah Bryant
HOBSON v. AMTRAK CORPORATION
as 1:2016cv00017
Plaintiff:
SINALOA HOBSON
Defendant:
AMTRAK CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WRIGHT v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION et al
as 1:2015cv02021
Plaintiff:
WANDA J. WRIGHT
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION and AMTRAK POLICE FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE NEW JERSEY LODGE 189
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
