Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Phillips Morales, et al v. Intelsat Global Service LLC, et al
as 13-7011
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Phillips S. Morales, John E. Gray, Ruth C. Labardee and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Frank A. L. Subaran, Tuna Alper, Samir Dajani and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Intelsat Global Service Corp., now known as Intelsat Global Service LLC,, Administrator, Intelsat Services Corp. Medical Benefit Plan, Intelsat, Ltd., now known as Intelsat S.A. and others
ITPE PENSION FUND et al v. STRONGHOLD SECURITY, LLC
as 1:2013cv00025
Plaintiff:
ITPE PENSION FUND , DENNIS R. ARRINGTON , JERRY M. BOWDEN and others
Defendant:
STRONGHOLD SECURITY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF UNITE HERE LOCAL 25 AND HOTEL ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON, D.C. PENSION FUND et al v. AREP EMBASSY ROW LLC et al
as 1:2011cv01737
Plaintiff:
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF UNITE HERE LOCAL 25 AND HOTEL ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON, D.C. PENSION FUND , BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF UNITE HERE LOCAL 25 AND HOTEL ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON, D.C. HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND and BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF UNITE HERE LOCAL 25 AND HOTEL ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON, D.C. GROUP LEGAL SERVICES FUND
Defendant:
AREP EMBASSY ROW LLC and WILLOW 2015 LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
ITPE PENSION FUND et al v. STRONGHOLD SECURITY, LLC
as 1:2011cv00940
Plaintiff:
ITPE PENSION FUND , DENNIS R. ARRINGTON , JERRY M. BOWDEN and others
Defendant:
STRONGHOLD SECURITY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
FANNING v. EMBASSY ROW HILTON HOTEL
as 1:2009cv02102
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R. FANNING
Defendant:
EMBASSY ROW HILTON HOTEL
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
ITPE PENSION FUND et al v. JENKINS SECURITY CONSULTANTS, INC.
as 1:2009cv01068
Plaintiff:
ITPE PENSION FUND, DENNIS ARRINGTON, JERRY BOWDEN and others
Defendant:
JENKINS SECURITY CONSULTANTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
