Cases filed in District of Columbia
Cases 91 - 100 of 167
INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. MANSFIELD BROS. PAINITING, INC.
as 1:2009cv01944
Plaintiff: INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, GARY J. MEYERS and PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES LABOR MANAGEMENT COOPERATION INITIATIVE
Defendant: MANSFIELD BROS. PAINTING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Type: Labor None
INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. SOUTHLAKE PAINTING & DECORATING, INC.
as 1:2009cv01849
Plaintiff: INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, GARY J. MEYERS, POLITICAL ACTION TOGETHER FUND and others
Defendant: SOUTHLAKE PAINTING & DECORATING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Type: Labor None
INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. DAVANC CONTRACTING, INC. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv01797
Plaintiff: INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, GARY J. MEYERS, POLITICAL ACTION TOGETHER FUND and others
Defendant: DAVANC CONTRACTING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Employee Pension Plan
Type: Labor None
INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. J & J PAINTING & MAINTENANCE INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv01722
Plaintiff: INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, GARY J. MEYERS, POLITICAL ACTION TOGETHER FUND and others
Defendant: J & J PAINTING & MAINTENANCE INC. and JAMES P. WILLIS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Employee Pension Plan
Type: Labor None
INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. VOGUE PAINTING & DECORATING, INC.
as 1:2009cv01591
Plaintiff: INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES INDUSTRY PENSION FUND and GARY J. MEYERS
Defendant: VOGUE PAINTING & DECORATING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Type: Labor None
INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. ROSE CITY GLASS CO., INC. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv01503
Plaintiff: INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, GARY J. MEYERS, POLITICAL ACTION TOGETHER FUND and others
Defendant: ROSE CITY GLASS CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Type: Labor None
INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. GLASS SERVICES, INC.
as 1:2009cv01459
Plaintiff: INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, GARY J. MEYERS, POLITICAL ACTION TOGETHER FUND and others
Defendant: GLASS SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Employee Pension Plan
Type: Labor None
INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. LAFAYETTE SIGN COMPANY
as 1:2009cv01464
Plaintiff: INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, GARY J. MEYERS, POLITICAL ACTION TOGETHER FUND and others
Defendant: LAFAYETTE SIGN COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Employee Pension Plan
Type: Labor None
INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. ALL - BRITE GLASS & MIRROR, CO.
as 1:2009cv01440
Plaintiff: INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, GARY J. MEYERS and PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES LABOR MANAGEMENT COOPERATION INITIATIVE
Defendant: ALL - BRITE GLASS & MIRROR, CO.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Type: Labor None
INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. L.K.A DRYWALL, INC. et al
as 1:2009cv01451
Plaintiff: INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, GARY J. MEYERS and PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES LABOR MANAGEMENT COOPERATION INITIATIVE
Defendant: L.K.A DRYWALL, INC. and LARRY HENDERSON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Employee Pension Plan
Type: Labor None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?