Cases 91 - 100 of 429
BUSH v. GONZALEZ et al
as 1:2011cv00839
Plaintiff:
BARBARA MICHELLE BUSH
Defendant:
GONZALEZ, OFFICE OF THE U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, BONNIE S. GREENBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OBAMA-CARTER v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2011cv00783
Plaintiff:
AUDREY OBAMA-CARTER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, BARACK OBAMA, GEORGE BUSH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AZIZ v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2011cv00747
Plaintiff:
TARIQ AZIZ
Defendant:
BARACK OBAMA, GEORGE W. BUSH, ERIC HOLDER, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Michelle Bush v. TREA, et al
as 11-8003
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michelle Barbara Bush
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of the Treasury and Office of Personnel Management
BUSH v. US DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY
as 1:2011cv00550
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE B. BUSH
Defendant:
US DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
COPEMANN v. BUSH, et al.,
as 1:2011cv00322
Plaintiff:
DALE ALONZO COPEMANN
Defendant:
LINDA BUSH and SUSAN ALTMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADIRONDACK MEDICAL CENTER et al v. SEBELIUS
as 1:2011cv00313
Plaintiff:
ADIRONDACK MEDICAL CENTER , AGNESIAN HEALTHCARE, INC. , ALBEMARLE HOSPITAL AUTHORITY and others
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
BUSH v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 1:2011cv00195
Plaintiff:
PEGGY BUSH
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Joan Malone v. George Bush
as 10-5408
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Joan Frances M. Malone
Defendant - Appellee:
George H.W. Bush, Former President, George W. Bush, Former President, Richard B. Cheney, Former Vice President, also known as Dick and others
MALONE v. BUSH et al
as 1:2010cv01902
Plaintiff:
JOAN FRANCES M. MALONE
Defendant:
GEORGE BUSH, SR., GEORGE W. BUSH, RICHARD CHENEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
