Cases 101 - 110 of 896
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2023cv01746
Plaintiff:
Rosa RAMIREZ, Elsy ALBERTO and NO PARTY
Defendant:
JACKPOT JANITORIAL & COMMERCIAL SERVICES, LLC and James SPEIGHT
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2023cv01690
Plaintiff:
AARON GREENSPAN and NO PARTY
Defendant:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR UNITES STATES ATTORNEYS, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2023cv01644
Not Classified By Court:
CARRIE J. TIMUS and DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Plaintiff:
NO PARTY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2023cv01445
Petitioner:
OSRX, Inc. and Ocular Science, Inc.
Respondent:
Hyman Phelps & MacNamara, P.C. and Karla L Palmer
Plaintiff:
NO PARTY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2023cv01444
Not Classified By Court:
OSRX, Inc., Ocular Science, Inc., Hyman Phelps & MacNamara, P.C. and others
Plaintiff:
NO PARTY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2023cv01371
Plaintiff:
MST SORAYA AKTHER and NO PARTY
Not Classified By Court:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, MERRICK B. GARLAND, RICHARD C. VISEK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2023cv01372
Plaintiff:
MAO YU and NO PARTY
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU and ALISSA L. EMMEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2023mc00053
Petitioner:
OSRX, Inc., Ocular Science, Inc. and NO PARTY
Respondent:
Hyman Phelps & MacNamara, P.C. and Karla L Palmer
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2023cv01361
Not Classified By Court:
SECRETARY CARLOS DEL TORO and JEROME W. JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
NO PARTY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
