Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 101 - 110 of 173
Safari Club International v. Sally Jewell, et al
as 13-5300
Plaintiff / Appellee: Ray Dockery, Roy Leifester, Galen Akin and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: Defenders of Wildlife, Humane Society of the United States, Born Free USA and others
Defendant / Appellee: United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Sally Jewell, in her official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior, United States Department of the Interior and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Safari Club International
SIERRA CLUB v. UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv01239
Plaintiff: SIERRA CLUB and NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION
Defendant: UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS , THOMAS P. BOSTICK , RICHARD A. PRATT and others
Intervenor_defendant: ENBRIDGE PIPELINES (FSP) L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS, INC. v. UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv01209
Defendant: UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE and SALLY JEWELL
Plaintiff: PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Conservation Force, et al v. Sally Jewell, et al
as 13-5179
Plaintiff - Appellant: Conservation Force, Steve Hornady, Barbara Lee Sackman and others
Defendant - Appellee: Sally Jewell, Secretary of Interior, in her official capacity, Daniel M. Ashe, Director of USFWS, in his official capacity and United States Fish and Wildlife Service
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HOME BUILDERS et al v. UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv02013
Defendant: UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE and KENNETH LEE SALAZAR
Plaintiff: NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HOME BUILDERS , OLYMPIA MASTER BUILDERS , HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION OF GREATER AUSTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES et al v. UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE et al
as 1:2012cv01965
Plaintiff: HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES and FUND FOR ANIMALS
Defendant: UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, KENNETH SALAZAR and DANIEL ASHE
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1540 Endangered Species Act
DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE et al v. SALAZAR et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv01833
Plaintiff: DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE , NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNSEL , SIERRA CLUB and others
Defendant: KENNETH LEE SALAZAR, DANIEL M. ASHE and UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1540 Endangered Species Act
Conservation Force, et al v. Kenneth Salazar, et al
as 12-5343
Plaintiff - Appellee: Conservation Force, Yukon Outfitters Association, Mervyn's Yukon Outfitting and others
Defendant - Appellant: Kenneth Lee Salazar, Secretary of Interior, in his official capacity, Rowan W. Gould, Acting Director of USF & WS, in his official capacity and United States Fish and Wildlife Service
Wildearth Guardians, et al v. Kenneth Salazar, et al
as 12-5312
Plaintiff - Appellant: Wildearth Guardians, Defenders of Wildlife and Sierra Club
Plaintiff - Appellee: Powder River Basin Resource Council, CA-11-037
Defendant - Appellee: Kenneth Lee Salazar, Secretary, U.S. Department of Interior, United States Bureau of Land Management and United States Fish and Wildlife Service
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee: Antelope Coal, LLC, State of Wyoming and National Mining Association
CONSERVATION FORCE v. SALAZAR et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv01665
Plaintiff: CONSERVATION FORCE
Defendant: KENNETH SALAZAR , UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR , DANIEL M. ASHE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?