Cases 131 - 140 of 338
AHMED v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2019cv02621
Defendant:
U.S. CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Plaintiff:
HAITHAM AHMED
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02606
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02571
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
HAMMAD v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2019cv02561
Defendant:
U.S. CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES, DAVID FRIEDMAN, MICHAEL R. POMPEO and others
Plaintiff:
AMIRA HAMMAD
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02532
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02534
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LAFEE v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2019cv02536
Defendant:
KAREN SASAHARA, U.S. CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES, MICHAEL R. POMPEO and others
Not Yet Classified:
U.S. CONSULATE, AMMAN, JORDAN
Plaintiff:
MOHAMMAD LAFEE
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1101
I.A. et al v. BARR et al
as 1:2019cv02530
Plaintiff:
A.G., L.C., TAHIRIH JUSTICE CENTER and others
Defendant:
MATTHEW ALBENCE, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Amicus Curiae:
IMMIGRATION REFORM LAW INSTITUTE
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1101
HAMAD v. MCALEENAN et al
as 1:2019cv02505
Defendant:
WILLIAM P. BARR, KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, KENNETH MADSEN and others
Plaintiff:
ALI HAMAD
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02496
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
