Cases 161 - 170 of 671
AT&T, Inc. v. FCC, et al
as 16-1002
Petitioner:
AT&T, Inc.
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Nueva Esperanza, Inc. v. FCC
as 15-1500
Petitioner:
Nueva Esperanza, Inc.
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Securus Technologies, Inc. v. FCC, et al
as 15-1498
Petitioner:
Securus Technologies, Inc.
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Natl. Assoc. of Regulatory v. FCC, et al
as 15-1497
Petitioner:
National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
KUSHNICK v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
as 1:2015cv02229
Defendant:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Plaintiff:
BRUCE A. KUSHNICK
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 552
Global TelLink v. FCC, et al
as 15-1461
Petitioner:
Global Tel*Link
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
Ulandis Forte, Ethel Peoples, Laurie Lamancusa and others
Professional Association for C v. FCC, et al
as 15-1440
Petitioner:
Professional Association for Customer Engagement, Inc.
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Amicus Curiae For Respondent:
National Consumer Law Center, National Association of Consumer Advocates, Consumers Union and others
Sirius XM Radio Inc. v. FCC, et al
as 15-1441
Petitioner:
Sirius XM Radio Inc.
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Amicus Curiae For Respondent:
Electronic Privacy Information Center
James Chelmowski v. FCC, et al
as 15-1425
Petitioner:
James Chelmowski
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
United States Telecom Assoc. v. FCC, et al
as 15-1414
Petitioner:
United States Telecom Association
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
