Cases 171 - 180 of 346
Kareemah Bell-Boston v. Thomas Reynold
as 12-5395
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kareemah Bell-Boston
Defendant - Appellee:
Thomas P. Reynolds, United States of America Capitol Police
BELL-BOSTON v. REYNOLDS
as 1:2012cv01931
Plaintiff:
KAREEMAH YASMINA BELL-BOSTON
Defendant:
THOMAS P. REYNOLDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kareemah Bell-Boston v. J. Nixon
as 12-7123
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kareemah Bell-Boston
Defendant - Appellee:
J. Nixon, Marshall Heights Workforce Community Development Organization
Kareemah Bell-Boston v. Janelle Pittman
as 12-7121
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kareemah Bell-Boston
Defendant - Appellee:
Janelle Pittman, Martin Luther King Jr. Memorial Library
BELL-BOSTON v. NIXON
as 1:2012cv01858
Plaintiff:
KAREEMAH BELL-BOSTON
Defendant:
J. NIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BELL-BOSTON v. PITTMAN
as 1:2012cv01857
Plaintiff:
KAREEMAH BELL-BOSTON
Defendant:
JANELLE PITTMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BELL v. FLEMMING et al
as 1:2012cv01760
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BELL
Defendant:
MARY FLEMMING and STEVE GLAUDE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
M. et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2012cv01704
Plaintiff:
RHONDA MOORE , B. M. , HELEN JONES and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc., et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran, et al
as 12-7103
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc., A Delaware Corporation and Bell Helicopter Textron Canada, Ltd., A Canadian Corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
Islamic Republic of Iran, A Foreign Nation, Iran Aircraft Manufacturing Company, An Iranian Corporation and Iran Helicopter Support & Renewal Co., An Iranian Corporation
USA v. Victor Bell
as 12-3072
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Victor Bell
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
