Cases 11 - 20 of 37
SENSORY, INC. v. GOOGLE LLC
as 1:2022cv00937
Plaintiff:
SENSORY, INC.
Defendant:
GOOGLE LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
AT&T Services, Inc. v. FCC, et al
as 20-1190
Respondent:
United States of America and Federal Communications Commission
Petitioner:
AT&T Services, Inc.
Intervenor:
Apple Inc., Broadcom Inc., Google LLC and others
Amicus Curiae:
Southern Company, Benton Institute for Broadband & Society, Public Knowledge and others
NONPARTY SUBPOENAS DUCES TECUM et al v. GOOGLE LLC et al
as 1:2021mc00038
Plaintiff:
VIDEOSHARE, LLC
Defendant:
YOUTUBE, LLC and GOOGLE LLC
In Re:
NONPARTY SUBPOENAS DUCES TECUM
RAINTREE MEDICAL AND CHIROPRACTIC CENTER LLC v. FACEBOOK, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv00658
Defendant:
ALPHABET INC., FACEBOOK, INC. and GOOGLE LLC
Plaintiff:
RAINTREE MEDICAL AND CHIROPRACTIC CENTER LLC and RODROCK CHIROPRACTIC PA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
KININ, INC. v. FACEBOOK, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv00622
Defendant:
ALPHABET INC., GOOGLE LLC and FACEBOOK, INC.
Plaintiff:
KININ, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
CLIFFY CARE LANDSCAPING LLC v. FACEBOOK INC. et al
as 1:2021cv00360
Defendant:
ALPHABET INC., GOOGLE LLC and FACEBOOK INC.
Plaintiff:
CLIFFY CARE LANDSCAPING LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
STATE OF COLORADO et al v. GOOGLE LLC
as 1:2020cv03715
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF NEBRASKA and others
Defendant:
GOOGLE LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
PAIGE v. GOOGLE LLC et al
as 1:2020cv03158
Defendant:
ALPHABET INC. and GOOGLE LLC
Plaintiff:
J. JACKSON PAIGE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
MCCREADY v. GOOGLE LLC et al
as 1:2020cv03556
Plaintiff:
JANETTE MCCREADY
Defendant:
ALPHABET INC. and GOOGLE LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
BLUMBERG v. GOOGLE LLC et al
as 1:2020cv03557
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN BLUMBERG
Defendant:
ALPHABET INC. and GOOGLE LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
