Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Caterpillar Inc. v. NLRB
as 13-1154
Petitioner: Caterpillar Inc.
Respondent: National Labor Relations Board
Intervenor: United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO
United Steel, Paper and Forest, et al v. FHA, et al
as 13-1036
Petitioner: United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, Nucor Corporation, McWane, Inc. and others
Respondent: Federal Highway Administration and Raymond L. LaHood, in his official capacity as Secretary of Transportation
United Steel, Paper And Fores v. PBGC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-5116
Plaintiff - Appellant: United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO-CLC, on behalf of the Participants and Beneficiaries of the Thunderbird Mining Co. Pension Plan
Defendant - Appellee: Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation
KSM Industries, Inc. v. NLRB
as 09-1126
Petitioner: KSM Industries, Inc.
Respondent: National Labor Relations Board
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent: United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union
UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO-CLC v. PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00517
Defendant: PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION and PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION
Plaintiff: UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO-CLC, UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO-CLC and UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO-CLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Type: Labor None
Methane Awareness Resources Gr v. MSHA, et al
as 09-1087
Petitioner: Methane Awareness Resources Group
Respondent: Mine Safety and Health Administration, Secretary of Labor, Secretary of Health and Human Services and others
Intervenor For Respondent: United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union
National Mining Association v. MSHA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-1241
Petitioner: National Mining Association
Respondent: Mine Safety and Health Administration and Secretary of Labor
Intervenor For Respondent: United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union
E I Du Pont & Co v. NLRB We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 06-1089
Petitioner: E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company
Respondent: National Labor Relations Board
Intervenor: United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union and United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, Local 1-6992
Kennecott Greens, et al v. MSHA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 01-1046
Terminated Party: AngloGold (Jerritt Canyon) Corp., Queenstake Resources Ltd. and United Steelworkers of America
Petitioner: Kennecott Greens Creek Mining Company
Respondent: Mine Safety and Health Administration and Secretary of Labor
Intervenor - Intervenor: United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO
Intervenor For Respondent: National Mining Association and Placer Turquoise Ridge Inc.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?