Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 35
SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM TO VERIZON WIRELESS
as 1:2019mc00100
In Re: SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM TO VERIZON WIRELESS
Petitioner: JOSEPH GHATTAS
SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM TO VERIZON WIRELESS
as 1:2019mc00106
In Re: SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM TO VERIZON WIRELESS
Petitioner: PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY
SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM TO VERIZON WIRELESS
as 1:2019mc00108
In Re: SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM TO VERIZON WIRELESS
Petitioner: CHRISTOPHER R. MURTHA
SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM TO VERIZON WIRELESS
as 1:2019mc00107
In Re: SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM TO VERIZON WIRELESS
Petitioner: HENRY P. STAWINSKI
SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM TO VERIZON WIRELESS et al
as 1:2019mc00099
In Re: SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM TO VERIZON WIRELESS
Petitioner: MISTINETTE MINTS
SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM TO VERIZON WIRELESS et al
as 1:2019mc00098
Petitioner: WILLIAM ALEXANDER
In Re: SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM TO VERIZON WIRELESS
NLRB v. Cellco Partnership
as 17-1165
Petitioner: National Labor Relations Board
Respondent: Cellco Partnership, d/b/a Verizon Wireless
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent: Communications Workers of America
Cellco Partnership v. NLRB We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-1158
Petitioner: Cellco Partnership, d/b/a Verizon Wireless
Respondent: National Labor Relations Board
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent: Communications Workers of America
Cellco Partnership v. NLRB
as 17-1069
Petitioner: Cellco Partnership, d/b/a Verizon Wireless
Respondent: National Labor Relations Board
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent: Sara Parrish
Stephen Shea v. Cellco Partnership, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-7135
: United States of America, ex rel. Stephen Shea
Plaintiff - Appellant: Stephen M. Shea
Defendant - Appellee: Cellco Partnership, doing business as Verizon Wireless, Verizon Business Network Services, Inc., Verizon Federal Inc. and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?