Cases 21 - 30 of 175
SHELTON et al v. OZ DIRECTIONAL DRILLING, INC.
as 1:2023cv00834
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH J. SHELTON, BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS AND PIPE LINE EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS AND PLCA NATIONAL PIPE LINE TRAINING FUND and others
Defendant:
OZ DIRECTIONAL DRILLING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. SHINE ON GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv00371
Plaintiff:
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND and BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND
Defendant:
SHINE ON GROUP, INC. doing business as SHINE ON WINDOW CLEANING and ANDREW NEWMAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. AVENTURA AT PROSPECT, LLC
as 1:2022cv03718
Plaintiff:
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND and BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND
Defendant:
Aventura at Prospect, LLC doing business as Aventura at Prospect
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2023cv00369
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, SHINE ON GROUP, INC. and others
Defendant:
NO PARTY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
MILLER v. HOWARD UNIVERSITY et al
as 1:2022cv03382
Plaintiff:
WINSTON MILLER
Defendant:
HOWARD UNIVERSITY and HOWARD UNIVERSITY BOARD OF TRUSTEES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2022cv03367
Plaintiff:
THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA doing business as UAB Hospital, THE HEALTH CARE AUTHORITY FOR BAPTIST HEALTH, AN AFFILIATE OF UAB HEALTH SYSTEM doing business as BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER EAST, THE HEALTH CARE AUTHORITY FOR BAPTIST HEALTH, AN AFFILIATE OF UAB HEALTH SYSTEM doing business as BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER SOUTH and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC.
as 1:2022cv03271
Plaintiff:
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND and BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND
Defendant:
SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. MERCHANTS EXCHANGE BUILDING HOLDINGS, INC.
as 1:2022cv00903
Plaintiff:
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND and SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND
Defendant:
MERCHANTS EXCHANGE BUILDING HOLDINGS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. FOREST HILL HEALTH CARE CENTER, INC.
as 1:2022cv02631
Plaintiff:
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND and BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND
Defendant:
FOREST HILL HEALTH CARE CENTER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Steven Florio, et al v. Gallaudet University, et al
as 22-7117
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Steven Florio, Patrick Costello, William Millios and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Gallaudet University, Board of Trustees of Gallaudet University, Roberta Cordano and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
