Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Nestor Ermogenes Quinteros, et al v. Dyncorp Aerospace Operations, et al
as 17-7093
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Nestor Ermogenes Arroyo Quinteros, La Comunidad de Mataje, Providence of Esmeraldas, Ecuador, on behalf of himself, as legal guardian of his minor child, Dociteo Sandobal Quinteros, La Comunidad de Mataje, Providence of Esmeraldas, Ecuador, on behalf of himself, as legal guardian of his minor child, Digna Aney Corozo Cortez, La Comunidad de Mataje, Providence of Esmeraldas, Ecuador, on behalf of himself, as legal guardian of his minor child and others
Defendant - Appellant:
DynCorp, a Delaware corporation, Dyncorp Aerospace Operations, LLC, a Delaware corporation, Dyncorp International, LLC, a Delaware corporation and others
Nestor Ermogenes Quinteros, et al v. Dyncorp Aerospace Operations, et al
as 17-7091
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Nestor Ermogenes Arroyo Quinteros, La Comunidad de Mataje, Providence of Esmeraldas, Ecuador, on behalf of himself, as legal guardian of his minor child, Dociteo Sandobal Quinteros, La Comunidad de Mataje, Providence of Esmeraldas, Ecuador, on behalf of himself, as legal guardian of his minor child, Digna Aney Corozo Cortez, La Comunidad de Mataje, Providence of Esmeraldas, Ecuador, on behalf of himself, as legal guardian of his minor child and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Edgar Balcazar, John Salas Sanchez, Luciano Quevedo Jimenez and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Dyncorp Aerospace Operations, LLC, a Delaware corporation, Dyncorp Techserv LLC, a Delaware corporation, Dyncorp International, LLC, a Delaware corporation and others
LOPEZ v. HYUN INC.
as 1:2015cv00453
Defendant:
HYUN INC., YUNHEE JUNG and WOOSEONG LEE
Plaintiff:
SILVIA LIMA LOPEZ
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Nestor Ermogenes Quinteros, et al v. Dyncorp Aerospace Operations, et al
as 13-7045
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Nestor Ermogenes Arroyo Quinteros, La Comunidad de Mataje, Providence of Esmeraldas, Ecuador, on behalf of himself, as legal guardian of his minor child, Dociteo Sandobal Quinteros, La Comunidad de Mataje, Providence of Esmeraldas, Ecuador, on behalf of himself, as legal guardian of his minor child, Digna Aney Corozo Cortez, La Comunidad de Mataje, Providence of Esmeraldas, Ecuador, on behalf of himself, as legal guardian of his minor child and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Dyncorp Aerospace Operations LLC, a Delaware corporation, Dyncorp Techserv LLC, a Delaware corporation, Dyncorp International, LLC, a Delaware corporation and others
MURILLO et al v. BAIN
as 1:2011cv01083
Plaintiff:
DAVID MURILLO and SILVIA MENCIAS
Defendant:
ROBERTO MICHELETTI BAIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
TORRES et al v. CAPITOL STAFFING SOLUTIONS, INC.
as 1:2011cv00591
Plaintiff:
SILVIA YANIRA TORRES and MARIA LARA MARQUEZ
Defendant:
CAPITOL STAFFING SOLUTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
KINGSBURY et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2009cv00833
Plaintiff:
MIRIAM KINGSBURY, SHONTEL BLACKMON, TYRONE KNIGHT and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and MICHELLE RHEE
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
JACKSON et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2009cv00354
Plaintiff:
DOREEN JACKSON, HELEN JONES, SHEILA BROWN and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and MICHELLE RHEE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE et al v. GUTIERREZ et al
as 1:2008cv01107
Plaintiff:
DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES and others
Defendant:
CARLOS GUTIERREZ and JAMES BALSIGER
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Defenders Wldlf, et al v. Gutierrez, Carlos, et al
as 07-5278
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Defenders of Wildlife, The Humane Society of the United States, Ocean Conservancy and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Carlos Gutierrez, Secretary, Department of Commerce, William Hogarth, Assistant Administrator for Fisheries, Michael Chertoff, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
