Cases 31 - 40 of 47
Transcon Gas Pipel v. FERC, et al
as 06-1286
Petitioner:
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and United States of America
Intervenor:
Piedmont Natural Gas Company, Inc., Baltimore Gas and Electric Company, Northeast Energy Associates and others
Doe, John, et al v. Exxon Mobil Corp, et al
as 05-7162
Plaintiff - Appellee:
John Doe, Village A, Aceh, Indonesia, John Doe, IV, Village D, Aceh, Indonesia, John Doe, V, Village E, Aceh, Indonesia and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Exxon Mobil Corporation, Exxon Mobil Oil Indonesia Inc., Mobil Corporation and others
Williams Gas Proc, et al v. FERC, et al
as 05-1342
Petitioner:
Williams Gas Processing - Gulf Coast Company, L. P. and Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and United States of America
Intervenor For Respondent:
Producer Coalition, Dominion Exploration & Production, Inc., Forest Oil Corporation and others
:
and
Exxon Mobil Corp v. FERC, et al
as 05-1299
Petitioner:
Exxon Mobil Corporation
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and United States of America
Intervenor:
Anadarko Petroleum Corporation, Chevron Natural Gas, Alaska Gasline Port Authority and others
Amicus Curiae For Appellee:
Legislative Budget and Audit Committee of the Alaska State Legislature
Exxon Mobil Corp, et al v. FERC
as 04-1226
Petitioner:
Exxon Mobil Corporation, ConocoPhillips Corporation, ChevronTexaco Natural Gas, a Division of Chevron U.S.A. Inc. and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
Piedmont Natural Gas Company, Inc., Brooklyn Union Gas Company, doing business as KeySpan Energy Delivery New York, KeySpan Gas East Corporation, doing business as KeySpan Energy Delivery Long Island and others
Intervenor For Petitioner:
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation
Terminated Party:
Sunoco, Inc.
:
Entergy Svcs v. FERC
as 03-1271
Petitioner:
Entergy Services, Inc.
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
Dow Chemical Company, Exxon Mobil Corporation, Occidental Chemical Corporation and others
Williams Gas Proc, et al v. FERC
as 03-1179
Petitioner:
Williams Gas Processing - Gulf Coast Company, L. P., Williams Field Services Company and Williams Gulf Coast Gathering Company, L.L.C.
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
Shell Offshore, Inc., Producer Coalition, Devon Energy Corporation and others
Intervenor For Petitioner:
Brooklyn Union Gas Company, doing business as KeySpan Energy Delivery New York, KeySpan Gas East Corporation, doing business as KeySpan Energy Delivery Long Island, Boston Gas Company, doing business as KeySpan Energy Delivery Long Island and others
ChevronTexaco Explor, et al v. FERC
as 03-1153
Petitioner:
ChevronTexaco Exploration & Production Co., a Division of Chevron U.S.A. Inc., BP America Production Company, BP Energy Company and others
Terminated Party:
Hunt Oil Company
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
Duke Energy Trading and Marketing, L.L.C., Duke Energy Fuels, L.P., Process Gas Consumers Group and others
No Nat Gas Co v. FERC
as 02-1107
Petitioner:
Northern Natural Gas Company
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
Northern Municipal Distributors Group, Midwest Region Gas Task Force Association, BP America Production Company and others
Terminated Party:
Reliant Energy Minnegasco, A Division of Reliant Energy Resources Corp.
Williams Companies, et al v. FERC
as 02-5056
Plaintiff - Appellee:
The Williams Companies, Inc. and Dynegy Midstream Services, Limited Partnership
Defendant - Appellant:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee:
Devon Energy Corporation, Dominion Exploration & Production, Inc., Forest Oil Corporation and others
Intervenor:
Chevron USA, Inc., Exxon Mobil Corporation, Shell Offshore, Inc. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
