Cases 31 - 38 of 38
AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION, AFL-CIO v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
as 1:2008cv00980
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION, AFL-CIO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7101 Labor-Management Relations
AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION, AFL-CIO v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
as 1:2008cv00614
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION, AFL-CIO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 1208 1970 Postal Act-enforced supervision by parent union
USPS v. Amer Pstl Wrkr Un
as 08-5056
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States Postal Service
Defendant - Appellant:
American Postal Workers Union
Amer Pstl Wrkr Un v. USPS
as 07-5316
Plaintiff - Appellant:
American Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Postal Service
AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION, AFL-CIO et al v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 1:2007cv00990
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION, AFL-CIO and CONSUMER ALLIANCE FOR POSTAL SERVICES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and MAILERS TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Cause Of Action: 05:App. 2,1 Federal Advisory Committee Act
AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION, AFL-CIO v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
as 1:2007cv00178
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION, AFL-CIO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409 Postal Service
AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION, AFL-CIO v. NATIONAL POSTAL MAIL HANDLERS UNION et al
as 1:2007cv00003
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION, AFL-CIO
Defendant:
NATIONAL POSTAL MAIL HANDLERS UNION, NATIONAL POSTAL MAIL HANDLERS UNION, NATIONAL POSTAL MAIL HANDLERS UNION and others
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 1208 1970 Postal Act-enforced supervision by parent union
Amer Pstl Wrkr Un v. NLRB
as 03-1322
Petitioner:
American Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO, Atlanta Metro Area Local
Respondent:
National Labor Relations Board
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
