Cases 41 - 50 of 153
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01782
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01771
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01744
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
GREWAL et al v. JADDOU et al
as 1:2022cv01723
Plaintiff:
RAMANJIT KAUR GREWAL and MANJINDER SINGH GREWAL
Defendant:
UR M. JADDOU, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and ALISSA EMMEL
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
SINGH et al v. JADDOU et al
as 1:2022cv01689
Plaintiff:
VIKRAM JEET SINGH and DAMANPREET KAUR
Defendant:
UR MENDOZA JADDOU, ANTONY J. BLINKEN, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration and Nationality Act
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2022cv01688
Plaintiff:
VIKRAN JEET SINGH, DAMANPREET KAUR and NO PARTY
Defendant:
UR MENDOZA JADDOU, ANTONY J. BLINKEN, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01625
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01591
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01482
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01454
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
