Cases 51 - 60 of 60
Ctr Natl Sec Studies, et al v. DOJ
as 02-5254
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Center for National Security Studies, American Civil Liberties Union, Electronic Privacy Information Center and others
Not Yet Classified:
The Washington Post Company, American Society of Newspaper Editors, National Press Club and others
Defendant / Appellant:
United States Department of Justice
Amicus Curiae:
Washington Legal Foundation and The Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs
Ctr Natl Sec Studies, et al v. DOJ
as 02-5254
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Center for National Security Studies, American Civil Liberties Union, Electronic Privacy Information Center and others
Terminated Party:
The Washington Post Company, American Society of Newspaper Editors, National Press Club and others
Defendant - Appellant:
United States Department of Justice
Amicus Curiae For Appellant:
Washington Legal Foundation and The Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs
Amicus Curiae For Appellee:
The Washington Post Company, ABC, Inc., American Society of Newspaper Editors and others
Northpoint Technol, et al v. FCC
as 02-1194
Appellant - Appellant:
Northpoint Technology, Ltd., Broadwave USA, Inc., Broadwave Network, LLC and others
Appellee - Appellee:
Federal Communications Commission
Terminated Party:
SkyBridge L.L.C.
Intervenor:
EchoStar Satellite Corporation, Satellite Broadcasting and Communications Association, DIRECTV, Inc. and others
Con Edison Co NY Inc, et al v. FERC
as 01-1345
Petitioner:
Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., PECO Energy Company, Pennsylvania Office of Consumer Advocate and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
Northeast Energy Associates, North Jersey Energy Associates, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation and others
Sinclair Bcast Grp v. FCC, et al
as 01-1079
Petitioner:
Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc.
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Intervenor For Respondent:
United Church of Christ, Black Citizens for a Fair Media, Center for Media Education and others
Amicus Curiae For Petitioner:
Paxson Communications Corporation
EchoStar Comm Corp v. FCC, et al
as 01-1032
Petitioner:
EchoStar Communications Corporation
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Intervenor:
Comcast Corporation, Comcast-Spectacor, L.P. and Philadelphia Sports Media, L.P.
Intervenor For Petitioner:
DIRECTV, Inc.
Terminated Party:
Cablevision Systems Corporation
MD DC DE Bcastr Assn, et al v. FCC, et al
as 00-1094
Petitioner:
MD/DC/DE Broadcasters Association, Alabama Broadcasters Association, Alaska Broadcasters Association and others
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Intervenor:
Minority Media and Telecommunications Council, African American Media Incubator, Alliance for Community Media and others
Amicus Curiae For Respondent:
American Federation of Television and Radio Artists, National Cable Television Association, Inc., NAMIC, Inc. and others
City Phil v. Con Rail Corp, et al
as 97-7221
Plaintiff - Appellee:
City of Philadelphia
Defendant - Appellee:
Consolidated Rail Corporation
Defendant - Appellant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Exxon Corp, et al v. FERC
as 97-1092
Petitioner:
Exxon Corporation, Conoco Inc., Mobil Natural Gas Inc. and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
Public Service Company of North Carolina, Transco Municipal Group, Municipal Gas Authority of Georgia and others
:
and
Process Gas Consum, et al v. FERC
as 93-1405
Petitioner:
Process Gas Consumers Group and American Iron and Steel Institute
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation, Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation, Pennsylvania Office of Consumer Advocate and others
Intervenor For Petitioner:
New York State Electric & Gas Corporation, Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company and others
:
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
