Cases 61 - 65 of 65
FMC CORPORATION v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY et al
as 1:2007cv02277
Plaintiff:
FMC CORPORATION
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and STEPHEN L. JOHNSON
Intervenor Defendant:
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC.
Amicu:
AMERICAN BIRD CONSERVANCY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
GREATER YELLOWSTONE COALITION et al v. KEMPTHORNE et al
as 1:2007cv02111
Plaintiff:
GREATER YELLOWSTONE COALITION, WILDERNESS SOCIETY, NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL and others
Defendant:
DIRK KEMPTHORNE, MARY BOMAR and MIKE SNYDER
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL et al v. KEMPTHORNE et al
as 1:2007cv01709
Plaintiff:
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION ALLIANCE, WYOMING OUTDOOR COUNCIL and others
Defendant:
DIRK KEMPTHORNE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and U.S. BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
SAN JUAN CITIZENS ALLIANCE et al v. NORTON et al
as 1:2004cv00182
Plaintiff:
SAN JUAN CITIZENS ALLIANCE, DINE CARE, OIL AND GAS ACCOUNTABILITY PROJECT and others
Defendant:
GALE NORTON, KATHLEEN CLARKE, LINDA S. RUNDELL and others
Intervenor Defendant:
WILLIAMS PRODUCTION COMPANY LLC, BP AMERICA PRODUCTION COMPANY, CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY and others
Amicus Curiae:
SOUTHERN UTE INDIAN TRIBE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
WILDERNESS SOCIETY, et al v. BABBITT, et al
as 1:1998cv02395
Plaintiff:
WILDERNESS SOCIETY , NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC. , GREENPEACE, INC. and others
Defendant:
BRUCE BABBITT , BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT , U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE and others
Intervenor_defendant:
ARCTIC SLOPE REGIONAL CORPORATION , STATE OF ALASKA , PHILLIPS ALASKA INC and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
