Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03340
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Dale Adams v. CIA, et al
as 23-5041
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dale B. Adams
Defendant / Appellee:
Central Intelligence Agency, William J. Burns, CIA Director and Allison Fong, CIA FOIA Agent
TOMLINSON et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2023cv00297
Plaintiff:
DOES 1 through 23, MELANIE TOMLINSON, KATHRYN GREENLEE and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, ISLAMIC REVOLUTIONARY GUARD CORPS, SHAHID BAKERI INDUSTRIAL GROUP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
ADAMS v. UNITED STATES CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY et al
as 1:2020cv00478
Defendant:
GINA HASPEL, ALLISON FONG and UNITED STATES CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
Plaintiff:
DALE B. ADAMS and DALE BRENT ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
ADAMS v. UNITED STATES CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY et al
as 1:2020cv00377
Defendant:
GINA HASPEL, ALLISON FONG and UNITED STATES CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
Plaintiff:
DALE B. ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
ADAMS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ARMY et al
as 1:2019cv02188
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DIRECTOR OF THE CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, UNITED STATES CIA INFORMATION AND PRIVACY COORDINATOR, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ARMY and others
Plaintiff:
DALE B. ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
MAYS v. SUMMERFORD
as 1:2019cv00342
Plaintiff:
SATOYA MAYS
Defendant:
ANITA ELAINE FONG SUMMERFORD and ANITA ELAINE TONG SUMMERFORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CHU et al v. TONG et al
as 1:2018cv02477
Plaintiff:
MAN OI YAN, WING KIU E WONG, YEUK KIT PANG and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, GREGORY RICHARDSON and KURT W. TONG
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
