Cases 1 - 4 of 4
In re: In The Matter of the Fort v. WMATA
as 13-7129
In Re:
In re: In The Matter of the Fort Totten Metrorail Cases Arising out of the Events of June 22, 2009
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Davonne Flanagan, Dawn Flanagan, Imhotep Yakub and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority and WPCompany, LLC, doing business as Was, doing business as The Washington Post
Defendant - Appellant:
Arinc, Inc. and Alstom Signaling, Inc.
In re: Fort Totten Metrorail Cases, et al v. WMATA, et al
as 12-7008
In Re:
In re: In The Matter of the Fort Totten Metrorail Cases Arising out of the Events of June 22, 2009
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Davonne Flanagan, Dawn Flanagan, Imhotep Yakub and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Oscar O. Flores, Individually and on behalf of the Estate of Ana Graciela Argentina Fernandez Bautista, dec'd; and on behalf of Jackelyn Fernandez Flores, minor child of Ana Graciela Argentina Fernandez Bautista, dec'd
Defendant - Appellee:
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority and Arinc, Inc.
IN RE: IN THE MATTER OF THE FORT TOTTEN METRORAIL CASES ARISING OUT OF THE EVENTS OF JUNE 22, 2009
as 1:2010mc00314
In Re:
IN THE MATTER OF THE FORT TOTTEN METRORAIL CASES ARISING OUT OF THE EVENTS OF JUNE 22, 2009
Plaintiff:
DAVONNE FLANAGAN, DAWN FLANAGAN, IMHOTEP YAKUB and others
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY, ARINC, INC., ALSTOM SIGNALING, INC. and others
Interested Party:
DAVID BOTTOMS
Petitioner:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
3Rd Party Defendant:
ROHR, INC. and AIRSEP CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
WILLIAMS-LEA v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2009cv01374
Plaintiff:
ANNETTE WILLIAMS-LEA
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
