Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Burlington Resrc Oil v. FERC
as 03-1340
Petitioner:
Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Company L.P.
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
Northern Natural Gas Company, Missouri Public Service Commission, Northern Municipal Distributors Group and others
AZ Corp Cmsn, et al v. FERC
as 03-1206
Petitioner:
Arizona Corporation Commission, Arizona Electric Power Cooperative, Inc., El Paso Electric Company and others
Terminated Party:
Arizona Gas Division of Citizens Communications Company
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
Arizona Public Service Company, Pinnacle West Energy Corporation, Pacific Gas and Electric Company and others
Intervenor For Petitioner:
Southwest Gas Corporation and BHP Copper Inc.
Williams Gas Proc, et al v. FERC
as 01-1327
Petitioner:
Williams Gas Processing - Gulf Coast Company, L. P. and Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
Dynegy Marketing and Trade, Brooklyn Union Gas Company, doing business as KeySpan Energy Delivery New York, KeySpan Gas East Corporation, doing business as KeySpan Energy Delivery Long Island and others
Intervenor For Respondent:
Amerada Hess Corporation, Anadarko Petroleum Corporation, Chevron USA, Inc. and others
Intervenor - Intervenor:
BP America Production Company, BP Energy Company, Delmarva Power & Light Company and others
ExxonMobil Gas Mkt v. FERC
as 00-1355
Petitioner:
ExxonMobil Gas Marketing Company, a Division of Exxon Mobil Corporation
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
ANR Pipeline Company, Sea Robin Pipeline Company, Williams Gas Processing - Gulf Coast Company, L. P. and others
Intervenor For Petitioner:
Independent Petroleum Association of America, Dominion Exploration & Production, Inc. and Total Exploration Production USA, Inc.
Terminated Party:
Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Company
Pub Util Cmsn St CA v. FERC
as 99-1390
Petitioner:
Public Utilities Commission of the State of California
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
El Paso Municipal Customer Group, Amoco Production Company, Citizens Utilities Company and others
:
Inter Nat Gas Assn v. FERC
as 98-1333
Petitioner:
Interstate Natural Gas Association of America
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
Missouri Gas Energy, Division of Southern Union Company, Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America, Williams Gas Pipelines Central, Inc. and others
Terminated Party:
Essex County Gas Company, Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation, Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Company and others
Intervenor For Petitioner:
Algonquin Gas Transmission Company, East Tennessee Natural Gas Company, Great Lakes Gas Transmission Limited Partnership and others
:
So CA Edison Co v. FERC
as 97-1699
Petitioner:
Southern California Edison Company
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
Kern River Gas Transmission Company, Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, El Paso Natural Gas Company and others
Intervenor For Respondent:
Southern California Gas Company
Intervenor For Petitioner:
City of Vernon, California
Terminated Party:
Pacific Gas Transmission Company
Con Edison Co NY Inc, et al v. FERC
as 97-1554
Petitioner:
Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., Brooklyn Union Gas Company, Public Service Electric & Gas Company and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
Northern Illinois Gas Company, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, Shell Offshore, Inc. and others
:
and
So CA Edison Co v. FERC
as 97-1450
Petitioner:
Southern California Edison Company
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, GPM Gas Corporation, El Paso Electric Company and others
CO Inter Gas Co v. FERC
as 97-1214
Petitioner:
Colorado Interstate Gas Company
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
UGI Utilities, Inc., Amoco Production Company, Amoco Energy Trading Corporation and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
