Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Issouf Coubaly, et al v. Cargill Incorporated, et al
as 22-7104
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Issouf Coubaly, Individually and on behalf of Proposed Class Members, Sidiki Bamba, Individually and on behalf of Proposed Class Members, Tenimba Djamoutene, Individually and on behalf of Proposed Class Members and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Cargill Incorporated, Nestle USA Inc., Cargill Cocoa and others
John Doe 1, et al v. Apple Inc., et al
as 21-7135
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John Doe 1, Individually and on behalf of Proposed Class Members, John Doe 2, Individually and on behalf of Proposed Class Members, Jane Doe 1, Individually and on behalf of Proposed Class Members and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Apple Inc., Alphabet Inc., Microsoft Corp. and others
Marilyn Keepseagle, et al v. Thomas Vilsack
as 16-5189
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Marilyn Keepseagle
Plaintiff - Appellant:
All Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
Thomas J. Vilsack
Interested Party - Appellant:
Donivon Craig Tingle, Silent Class Member
In re: Georgetown Synagogue, et al
as 15-8006
Defendant - Petitioner:
Georgetown Synagogue-Kesher Israel Congregation, National Capital Mikvah, Inc. and Rabbinical Council of America, Inc.
Plaintiff - Respondent:
Jane Doe 2, And all other class members as defined herein
Nasrin Mohammadi, et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran, et al
as 13-7109
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Nasrin Mohammadi, and Other Class Members, Manouchehr Mohammadi, Reza Mohammadi and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Islamic Republic of Iran, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Ayatollah Ali Hoseini Khamenei and others
Manuel Garcia, et al v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al
as 13-5067
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Manuel Gudiel Garcia, As Heirs of CELSO RAMIREZ REYES, FEDERICO RAMOS MESA, MARTA CESAREA PEREZ RUIZ, VICTOR MANUEL TECU FLORIAN and Jane and John Does, all individually and on behalf of proposed Class Members, Gonzalo Ramirez Tista, As Heirs of CELSO RAMIREZ REYES, FEDERICO RAMOS MESA, MARTA CESAREA PEREZ RUIZ, VICTOR MANUEL TECU FLORIAN and Jane and John Does, all individually and on behalf of proposed Class Members, Victoria Ramirez Tista, As Heirs of CELSO RAMIREZ REYES, FEDERICO RAMOS MESA, MARTA CESAREA PEREZ RUIZ, VICTOR MANUEL TECU FLORIAN and Jane and John Does, all individually and on behalf of proposed Class Members and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (DHHS)(formerly Department of Health, Education and Welfare (HEW)), Howard K. Koh, M.D.,MPH, Assistant Secretary for Health U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (DHHS)(overseer of the U.S. Public Health Service (PHS)), Regina M. Benjamin, VICE ADMIRAL, M.D., Surgeon General, U.S. Public Health Service (PHS)) and others
Manuel Garcia, et al v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al
as 12-5257
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Manuel Gudiel Garcia, As Heirs of CELSO RAMIREZ REYES, FEDERICO RAMOS MESA, MARTA CESAREA PEREZ RUIZ, VICTOR MANUEL TECU FLORIAN and Jane and John Does, all individually and on behalf of proposed Class Members, Gonzalo Ramirez Tista, As Heirs of CELSO RAMIREZ REYES, FEDERICO RAMOS MESA, MARTA CESAREA PEREZ RUIZ, VICTOR MANUEL TECU FLORIAN and Jane and John Does, all individually and on behalf of proposed Class Members, Victoria Ramirez Tista, As Heirs of CELSO RAMIREZ REYES, FEDERICO RAMOS MESA, MARTA CESAREA PEREZ RUIZ, VICTOR MANUEL TECU FLORIAN and Jane and John Does, all individually and on behalf of proposed Class Members and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (DHHS)(formerly Department of Health, Education and Welfare (HEW)), Howard K. Koh, M.D.,MPH, Assistant Secretary for Health U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (DHHS)(overseer of the U.S. Public Health Service (PHS)), Regina M. Benjamin, VICE ADMIRAL, M.D., Surgeon General, U.S. Public Health Service (PHS)) and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
