Cases 1 - 7 of 7
MISO Transmission Owners, et al v. FERC
as 23-1033
Petitioner:
MISO Transmission Owners, Ameren Services Company, as agent for Union Electric Company, d/b/a Ameren Missouri, Ameren Illinois Company, d/b/a Ameren Illinois and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
MISO Transmission Owners, et al v. FERC
as 22-1223
Petitioner:
MISO Transmission Owners, Ameren Services Company, as agent for Union Electric Company, d/b/a Ameren Missouri, Ameren Illinois Company, d/b/a Ameren Illinois and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Association of Businesses, et al v. FERC
as 20-1513
Petitioner:
Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc., Illinois Industrial Energy Consumers, Coalition of MISO Transmission Customers and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Ass'n of Businesses Advocating, et al v. FERC
as 20-1251
Petitioner:
Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc., Illinois Industrial Energy Consumers, Coalition of MISO Transmission Customers and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
MISO Transmission Owners, et al v. FERC
as 20-1262
Petitioner:
MISO Transmission Owners, Entergy Arkansas, LLC, Ameren Services Company, as agent for Union Electric Company, d/b/a Ameren Missouri and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
MISO Transmission Owners v. FERC
as 20-1261
Petitioner:
MISO Transmission Owners, Entergy Arkansas, LLC, Prairie Power, Inc. and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
MISO Transmission Owners v. FERC
as 16-1449
Petitioner:
MISO Transmission Owners, Ameren Services Company, agent of Union Electric Company, d/b/a Ameren Missouri, Ameren Illinois Company, d/b/a Ameren Illinois, d/b/a Ameren Transmission Company of Illinois and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Movant-Intervenor For Petitioner:
Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
