Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Duke Energy Progress, LLC v. FERC
as 23-1302
Petitioner:
Duke Energy Progress, LLC
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION (NO. II)- MDL NO. 2925
as 1:2020mc00008
Plaintiff:
WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, NORTHERN INDIANA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY LLC, AK STEEL CORPORATION and others
Defendant:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and others
In Re:
RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION (NO. II)- MDL NO. 2925
Interested Party:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION, UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION, CVR ENERGY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 15 Antitrust Litigation
Duke Energy Progress, LLC v. FERC
as 23-1114
Petitioner:
Duke Energy Progress, LLC
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
BellSouth Telecommunications, LLC v. FCC, et al
as 23-1010
Petitioner:
BellSouth Telecommunications, LLC, d/b/a AT&T North Carolina, d/b/a AT&T South Carolina
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Intervenor:
Duke Energy Progress, LLC
Duke Energy Progress, LLC v. FERC
as 22-1327
Petitioner:
Duke Energy Progress, LLC
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Duke Energy Progress, LLC v. FERC
as 22-1284
Petitioner:
Duke Energy Progress, LLC
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Duke Energy Progress, LLC v. FERC
as 22-1072
Petitioner:
Duke Energy Progress, LLC
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Duke Energy Progress, LLC v. FERC
as 21-1272
Petitioner:
Duke Energy Progress, LLC
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Duke Energy Progress, LLC v. FERC
as 21-1008
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Petitioner:
Duke Energy Progress, LLC
Duke Energy Progress, LLC v. FERC
as 20-1495
Intervenor:
North Carolina Eastern Municipal Power Agency
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Petitioner:
Duke Energy Progress, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
