Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01507
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01505
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00345
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
ULLAH v. HOWELL
as 1:2023cv03405
Plaintiff:
UBAID ULLAH
Defendant:
JAYNE A. HOWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
SHAH v. HOWELL
as 1:2023cv03263
Plaintiff:
SYED ZAHEER SHAH
Defendant:
JAYNE A. HOWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MALIK et al v. HOWELL
as 1:2023cv03159
Plaintiff:
FARAH MALIK, SHAD ANWER, MUHAMMAD AHMAD MANSOOR and others
Defendant:
REBECCA PASINI and JAYNE A. HOWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
CHENG et al v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2023cv02602
Plaintiff:
JIAN YI CHENG, XING CHEN, HOURASA SEIRAFITEHRANIAN and others
Defendant:
ANTONY BLINKEN, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
