Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Transmission Agency of N. Cali, et al v. FERC
as 15-1241
Petitioner:
Transmission Agency of Northern California, Modesto Irrigation District, City of Redding, California and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Transmission Agency, et al v. FERC
as 15-1057
Petitioner:
Transmission Agency of Northern California, Modesto Irrigation District, City of Santa Clara, California and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Movant-Intervenor For Petitioner:
Sacramento Municipal Utility District
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
California Independent System Operator Corporation, M-S-R Public Power Agency, Pacific Gas and Electric Company and others
Sacramento Municipal Utility D v. FERC
as 12-1276
Petitioner:
Sacramento Municipal Utility District
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Movant-Intervenor:
City of Santa Clara, California, M-S-R Public Power Agency and Transmission Agency of Northern California
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
American Public Power Association
Sacramento Municipal Utility D v. FERC
as 09-1141
Petitioner:
Sacramento Municipal Utility District
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor For Petitioner:
Modesto Irrigation District, City of Santa Clara, California, Transmission Agency of Northern California and others
Intervenor For Respondent:
California Independent System Operator Corporation, DC Energy, LLC and Transmission Access Policy Study Group
Sacramento Municipal Utility D v. FERC
as 09-1142
Petitioner:
Sacramento Municipal Utility District, also known as SMUD
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Movant-Intervenor For Petitioner:
M-S-R Public Power Agency, Modesto Irrigation District, City of Santa Clara, California, doing business as Silicon Valley Power and others
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
California Independent System Operator Corporation, DC Energy, LLC and Pacific Gas and Electric Company
Sacramento Municip. Util. Dist v. FERC
as 07-1208
Petitioner:
Sacramento Municipal Utility District
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor For Respondent:
California Independent System Operator Corporation, Independent Energy Producers Association, Pacific Gas and Electric Company and others
Intervenor For Petitioner:
City and County of San Francisco, California, Transmission Agency of Northern California, Modesto Irrigation District and others
Transm Agcy No CA, et al v. FERC
as 05-1402
Petitioner:
Transmission Agency of Northern California, City of Santa Clara, California, City of Redding, California and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
Southern California Edison Company, California Electricity Oversight Board, California Independent System Operator Corporation and others
Intervenor For Petitioner:
California Power Agency and Northern California Power Agency
We Area Power Admin v. FERC
as 04-1090
Petitioner:
Western Area Power Administration
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
Southern California Edison Company, California Electricity Oversight Board, California Independent System Operator Corporation and others
:
So CA Edison Co, et al v. FERC
as 02-1374
Petitioner:
Southern California Edison Company and Pacific Gas and Electric Company
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
San Diego Gas & Electric Company
Intervenor For Petitioner:
Northern California Power Agency, Transmission Agency of Northern California, M-S-R Public Power Agency and others
CA Dept Water Rescr v. FERC
as 01-1234
Petitioner:
California Department of Water Resources
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
California Independent System Operator Corporation, Southern California Edison Company and California Electricity Oversight Board
Intervenor For Petitioner:
M-S-R Public Power Agency, City of Palo Alto, California, City of Redding, California and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
