Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Consumer Financial Protection, et al v. OCWEN Financial Corporation, et al
as 14-5265
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, State of Alabama, Alabama Attorney General's Office, State of Alaska, Alaska Attorney General's Office and others
Defendant - Appellee:
OCWEN Financial Corporation and OCWEN Loan Servicing, LLC
Movant - Appellant:
Christopher Stoller
CT Dept. of Public Util. Ctrl v. FERC
as 09-1040
Petitioner:
Connecticut Department of Public Utility Control, Richard Blumenthal, Attorney General for the State of Connecticut and Connecticut Office of Consumer Counsel
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Movant-Intervenor For Petitioner:
United Illuminating Company, Massachusetts Attorney General, Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities and others
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
Northeast Utilities Companies and Maine Public Utilities Commission
CT Dept. of Public Utility v. FERC
as 08-1199
Petitioner:
Connecticut Department of Public Utility Control, Maine Public Utilities Commission, Vermont Department of Public Service and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor For Petitioner:
Braintree Electric Light Department, Massachusetts Attorney General, Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities and others
Intervenor For Respondent:
Bangor Hydro-Electric Company, Central Maine Power Company, Fitchburg Gas and Electric Light Company and others
Amicus Curiae For Petitioner:
NEPOOL Industrial Customer Coalition
Verizon Telephone Companies v. FCC
as 08-1012
Petitioner:
Verizon Telephone Companies
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Intervenor For Respondent:
Covad Communications Group, Inc., NuVox, Inc., XO Communications Inc. and others
Intervenor For Petitioner:
Qwest Communications International Inc. and Qwest Corporation
Amicus Curiae For Respondent:
Full Service Computing Corporation, doing business as Full Service Network
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
