Cases 1 - 7 of 7
BLAKE v. MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER & SMITH INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2019cv00492
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO CLEARING SERVICES, LLC and MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH INCORPORATED
Petitioner:
WILLIAM R BLAKE
Respondent:
MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER & SMITH INCORPORATED
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM R. BLAKE III
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORPORATION et al v. NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION BOARD
as 1:2019cv00347
Plaintiff:
COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC., COUNTRYWIDE SECURITIES CORPORATION, MERRILL LYNCH MORTGAGE LENDING, INC. and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION BOARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
USA, et al v. Deutsche Bank Trust Company Am, et al
as 14-7186
Plaintiff:
United States of America, ex rel. Prescott Lovern
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Prescott Lovern
Defendant - Appellee:
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, Merrill Lynch Credit Products, LLC, Merrill Lynch L.P. Holdings, Inc. and others
MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH INCORPORATED v. GRAHAM
as 1:2012cv00028
Petitioner:
MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH INCORPORATED
Respondent:
NIGEL GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION et al v. BJORING et al
as 1:2011cv00405
Plaintiff:
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION and MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER & SMITH INCORPORATED
Defendant:
JONATHAN BJORING, MICHAEL GRAY, JASON HADDAWAY and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
MERRILL LYNCH et al v. BRAHMBHATT et al
as 1:2008cv00957
Plaintiff:
MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH INCORPORATED, MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH INCORPORATED, MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH INCORPORATED and others
Defendant:
JINESH BRAHMBHATT and DARSHAN MAKIM
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Lessin, Michael v. Merrill Lynch Pierce, et al
as 06-7067
Appellant:
Michael Lessin
Appellee:
Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Inc. and Brett Bernstein
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
