Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Central Maine Power Company, et al v. FERC
as 23-1335
Petitioner: Central Maine Power Company, United Illuminating Company, Eversource Energy Service Company, on behalf of The Connecticut Light and Power Company, Public Service Company of New Hampshire, and NSTAR Electric Company and others
Respondent: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Eversource Energy Service Company v. FERC
as 23-1167
Petitioner: Eversource Energy Service Company, on behalf of The Connecticut Light and Power Company, Public Service Company of New Hampshire, and NSTAR Electric Company
Respondent: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Central Maine Power Company, et al v. FERC
as 20-1329
Petitioner: Vermont Transco LLC, New England Power Company, d/b/a National Grid, Versant Power, f/k/a Emera Maine and others
Respondent: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Emera Maine, et al v. FERC
as 15-1212
Petitioner: Emera Maine, formerly known as Bangor Hydro-Electric Company, Central Maine Power Company, New England Power Company, doing business as National Grid and others
Respondent: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
NSTAR Electric Company v. FERC
as 12-1074
Petitioner: NSTAR Electric Company
Respondent: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Braintree Electric Light Dept., et al v. FERC, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-1231
Petitioner: Braintree Electric Light Department, Hingham Municipal Lighting Plant, Hull Municipal Lighting Plant and others
Respondent: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent: NSTAR Electric Company, NEPOOL Participants Committee and ISO New England Inc.
CT Dept. of Public Utility v. FERC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-1199
Petitioner: Connecticut Department of Public Utility Control, Maine Public Utilities Commission, Vermont Department of Public Service and others
Respondent: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor For Petitioner: Braintree Electric Light Department, Massachusetts Attorney General, Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities and others
Intervenor For Respondent: Bangor Hydro-Electric Company, Central Maine Power Company, Fitchburg Gas and Electric Light Company and others
Amicus Curiae For Petitioner: NEPOOL Industrial Customer Coalition
Connecticut Department of Publ v. FERC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-1375
Petitioner: Connecticut Department of Public Utility Control
Respondent: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor: New England Power Pool Participants Committee, NRG Power Marketing, Inc., Connecticut Jet Power, LLC and others
Intervenor For Petitioner: Maine Public Utilities Commission, Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities and Richard Blumenthal
Amicus Curiae For Petitioner: National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners, Organization of MISO States, Inc., California Public Utilities Commission and others
Amicus Curiae For Respondent: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. and The Electric Power Supply Association
Blumenthal, Richard v. FERC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-1130
Petitioner: Richard Blumenthal, Attorney General for the State of Connecticut
Respondent: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor: NEPOOL Industrial Customer Coalition, ISO New England Inc., Dominion Energy Marketing, Inc. and others
Intervenor For Petitioner: NSTAR Electric & Gas Corporation
ME Public Utilities Commission v. FERC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 06-1403
Petitioner: Maine Public Utilities Commission
Respondent: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor: Connecticut Department of Public Utility Control, TransCanada Power Marketing Ltd., Internationall Power America, Inc. and others
Intervenor For Petitioner: Industrial Energy Consumer Group, NEPOOL Industrial Customer Coalition and NSTAR Electric & Gas Corporation
Amicus Curiae For Respondent: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
: NRG Energy, Inc.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?