Cases 1 - 10 of 10
VERIZON PENNSYLVANIA LLC et al v. SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, L.P. et al
as 1:2013cv00979
Plaintiff:
VERIZON PENNSYLVANIA LLC , VERIZON NEW JERSEY, INC. , VERIZON DELAWARE LLC and others
Defendant:
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, L.P., SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P., AMERICAN PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
NextWave Prsnal Comm, et al v. FCC, et al
as 00-1402
Petitioner:
NextWave Personal Communications Inc. and NextWave Power Partners, Inc.
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Intervenor For Respondent:
BellSouth Corporation, BellSouth Cellular Corporation, Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association and others
Intervenor:
Cellco Partnership, doing business as Verizon Wireless, VoiceStream Wireless Corporation, AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. and others
Terminated Party:
Nextel Communications, Inc.
Amicus Curiae For Petitioner:
Kenneth N. Klee, Robert E. Torricelli, Senator, Charles E. Schumer, Senator and others
Qwest Corp, et al v. FCC, et al
as 00-1376
Petitioner:
Qwest Corporation, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company and Pacific Bell Telephone Company
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Intervenor For Respondent:
Metrocall, Inc.
Intervenor:
TSR Wireless LLC, Personal Communications Industry Association and Arch Communications Group, Inc.
US Telecom Assn v. FCC, et al
as 99-1442
Petitioner:
United States Telecom Association
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Intervenor:
AirTouch Communications, Inc.
Intervenor For Petitioner:
Sprint Spectrum L.P., doing business as Sprint PCS, Personal Communications Industry Association, Telecommunications Industry Association and others
:
QUALCOMM Inc v. FCC, et al
as 98-1246
Petitioner:
QUALCOMM Incorporated
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Intervenor:
PrimeCo Personal Communications, L.P. and Sprint Spectrum L.P., doing business as Sprint PCS
Cell Telecom Indust v. FCC, et al
as 97-1690
Petitioner:
Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Intervenor:
Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, US WEST Communications, Inc. and State of Texas
Intervenor For Petitioner:
Personal Communications Industry Association, Comcast Cellular Communications, Inc., Vanguard Cellular Systems, Inc. and others
Intervenor For Respondent:
BellSouth Corporation
GTE Svc Corp, et al v. FCC, et al
as 97-1538
Petitioner:
GTE Service Corporation and Micronesian Telecommunications Corporation
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Intervenor For Petitioner:
MCI Communications Corporation, SBC Communications Inc., US WEST, Inc. and others
Intervenor:
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, State of Hawaii, State of Alaska and others
Terminated Party:
IT&E Overseas, Inc.
Intervenor For Respondent:
AT&T Corporation
Elec Eng Co v. FCC
as 97-1255
Appellant - Appellant:
Electronic Engineering Company
Appellee - Appellee:
Federal Communications Commission
Intervenor:
PageMart II, Inc. and Personal Communications Industry Association
Telecom Resellers, et al v. FCC, et al
as 97-1071
Terminated Party:
National Wireless Resellers Association
Petitioner:
Telecommunications Resellers Association, Cellular Service, Inc. and ComTech, Inc.
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Intervenor For Respondent:
Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile, Inc., AirTouch Communications, Inc., Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association and others
Cassell, James A., et al v. FCC
as 97-1005
Appellant - Appellant:
James A. Cassell and Kelley Communications, Inc.
:
United States of America
Appellee - Appellee:
Federal Communications Commission
Intervenor For Respondent:
Potomac Corporation, doing business as Crescent Communications
Intervenor:
Nextel Communications, Inc. and Personal Communications Industry Association
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
