Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Public Service Company of New Mexico, et al v. FERC
as 22-1175
Petitioner:
Public Service Company of New Mexico
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Public Service Company of New Mexico v. FERC
as 22-1176
Petitioner:
Public Service Company of New Mexico
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
NLRB v. Public Service Company of New
as 14-1122
Petitioner:
National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
Public Service Company of New Mexico
Public Service Company v. NLRB
as 14-1074
Petitioner:
Public Service Company of New Mexico
Respondent:
National Labor Relations Board
CO Off Consum Coun, et al v. FERC
as 04-1238
Petitioner:
Colorado Office of Consumer Counsel, Attorney General of the State of Rhode Island, Attorney General of the State of New Mexico and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor For Petitioner:
American Gas Association, Proliance Energy, LLC, Morgan Stanley and others
Intervenor:
National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates, Sacramento Municipal Utility District, New England Conference of Public Utilities Commissioners and others
Intervenor For Respondent:
Wisconsin Public Service Corporation and Upper Peninsula Power Company
AZ Corp Cmsn, et al v. FERC
as 03-1206
Petitioner:
Arizona Corporation Commission, Arizona Electric Power Cooperative, Inc., El Paso Electric Company and others
Terminated Party:
Arizona Gas Division of Citizens Communications Company
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
Arizona Public Service Company, Pinnacle West Energy Corporation, Pacific Gas and Electric Company and others
Intervenor For Petitioner:
Southwest Gas Corporation and BHP Copper Inc.
St NY, et al v. EPA
as 02-1387
Petitioner:
State of New York, State of Connecticut, State of Maine and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor:
NSR Manufacturers Roundtable, Clean Air Implementation Project, Commonwealth of Virginia and others
Intervenor For Respondent:
American Petroleum Institute, Utility Air Regulatory Group, Illinois State Chamber of Commerce and others
Terminated Party:
National Environmental Development Association's Clean Air Regulatory Project
Amicus Curiae For Petitioner:
Clean Air Trust, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Jon S. Corzine and others
Amicus Curiae For Respondent:
State of Florida
Amicus Curiae:
James M. Inhofe
Cnstltn Engy, et al v. FERC
as 02-1367
Terminated Party:
Constellation Power Source, Inc.
Petitioner:
Constellation Energy Commodities Group, Inc.
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
California Power Exchange Corporation, Northern California Power Agency, Pacific Gas and Electric Company and others
Intervenor For Petitioner:
City of Santa Clara, California
Cement Kiln Recycl v. EPA, et al
as 99-1457
Petitioner:
Cement Kiln Recycling Coalition
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Christine Todd Whitman, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency
Terminated Party:
Carol M. Browner, Administrator
Intervenor For Petitioner:
Dow Chemical Company, Coalition for Responsible Waste Incineration, General Electric Company and others
Intervenor For Respondent:
Solite Corporation, Sierra Club and Environmental Technology Council, Inc.
Intervenor:
Lafarge Corporation
Amicus Curiae:
Appalachian Power Company, Baltimore Gas and Electric Company, Carolina Power & Light Company and others
:
Amer Corn Growers v. EPA
as 99-1348
Petitioner:
American Corn Growers Association
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor For Petitioner:
State of Michigan, Department of Environmental Quality
Intervenor:
Clean Air Implementation Project, Center for Energy and Economic Development and Western Fuels Association, Inc.
Intervenor For Respondent:
National Tribal Environmental Council, State of New Hampshire, Appalachian Mountain Club and others
Amicus Curiae For Respondent:
State of Utah, State of Washington, Department of Ecology and New Mexico Environment Department
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
