Cases 1 - 10 of 18,418
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01649
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01650
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
PROJECT ON GOVERNMENT OVERSIGHT, INC. v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE
as 1:2024cv01647
Plaintiff:
PROJECT ON GOVERNMENT OVERSIGHT, INC.
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
AMERICA FIRST LEGAL FOUNDATION v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2024cv01628
Plaintiff:
AMERICA FIRST LEGAL FOUNDATION
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
EEON et al v. UNITED STATES
as 1:2024cv01626
Plaintiff:
EEON and EEON FOUNDATION
Defendant:
UNITED STATES and FEDERAL RESERVE BANK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States Steel Corporation v. EPA, et al
as 24-1172
Petitioner:
United States Steel Corporation
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Hybar LLC v. EPA, et al
as 24-1176
Petitioner:
Hybar LLC
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. v. EPA, et al
as 24-1170
Petitioner:
Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
United States Steel Corporation v. EPA, et al
as 24-1171
Petitioner:
United States Steel Corporation
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
