Cases 1 - 6 of 6
SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 1:2024cv01603
Plaintiff:
SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and U.S. HEALTH RESOURCES AND SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
MERCK SHARP & DOHME LLC v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 1:2022cv01986
Plaintiff:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME LLC
Defendant:
US DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, XAVIER BECERRA, U.S. HEALTH RESOURCES AND SERVICES ADMINISTRATION and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
United Therapeutics Corporation v. Diana Espinosa, et al
as 21-5304
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United Therapeutics Corporation
Defendant / Appellant:
Diana Espinosa, Acting Administrator of U.S. Health Resources and Services Administration, U.S. Health Resources and Services Administration, Xavier Becerra, Secretary of Health and Human Services and others
KALDEROS, INC. v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2021cv02608
Plaintiff:
KALDEROS, INC.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DIANA ESPINOSA, U.S. HEALTH RESOURCES AND SERVICES ADMINISTRATION and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
LATHAM & WATKINS LLP v. U.S. HEALTH RESOURCES AND SERVICES ADMINISTRATION et al
as 1:2021cv01862
Plaintiff:
LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
Defendant:
U.S. HEALTH RESOURCES AND SERVICES ADMINISTRATION and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
UNITED THERAPEUTICS CORPORATION v. ESPINOSA et al
as 1:2021cv01686
Defendant:
DIANA ESPINOSA, XAVIER BECERRA, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED THERAPEUTICS CORPORATION
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, 304B HEALTH, AMERICA'S ESSENTIAL HOSPITALS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
