Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION (NO. II)- MDL NO. 2925 We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020mc00008
Plaintiff: WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, NORTHERN INDIANA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY LLC, AK STEEL CORPORATION and others
Defendant: UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and others
In Re: RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION (NO. II)- MDL NO. 2925
Interested Party: NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION, UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION, CVR ENERGY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
CEMEX, INC. et al v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY et al
as 1:2020cv00269
Defendant: UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and others
Plaintiff: POTLATCHDELTIC CORPORATION, GOODYEAR TIRE AND RUBBER COMPANY, CEMEX, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2020cv00268
Plaintiff: POTLATCHDELTIC CORPORATION, GOODYEAR TIRE AND RUBBER COMPANY, CEMEX, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
FANNING v. UNILEVER MANUFACTURING (US), INC.
as 1:2016cv01722
Plaintiff: MICHAEL R. FANNING
Defendant: UNILEVER MANUFACTURING (US), INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
LADSON v. UNILEVER UNITED STATES, INC. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv01373
Plaintiff: AVE MARIA M. LADSON
Defendant: UNILEVER UNITED STATES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. UNILEVER N.V. et al
as 1:2011cv00858
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: UNILEVER N.V. , UNILEVER PLC , CONOPCO, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25
UNILEVER PATENT HOLDINGS B.V. v. KAPPOS
as 1:2009cv01673
Plaintiff: UNILEVER PATENT HOLDINGS B.V.
Defendant: DAVID J. KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?