Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00468
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02733
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Cai-Yen Firestone v. Federal Retirement Thrift Inv, et al
as 19-5101
Defendant / Appellee: Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board, Melissa Wang and Thrift Savings Plan
Plaintiff / Appellant: Cai-Yen Firestone
FIRESTONE v. FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv01810
Defendant: FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD and THRIFT SAVINGS PLAN
Plaintiff: CAI-YEN FIRESTONE
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01403
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
William Rogers, et al v. Commissioner of IRS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-1241
Petitioner - Appellant: William D. Rogers and Yen-Ling K. Rogers
Respondent - Appellee: Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
FANNING v. EVANSTON NORTHSHORE HOTEL PARTNERS, LLC et al
as 1:2011cv01064
Plaintiff: MICHAEL R. FANNING
Defendant: EVANSTON NORTHSHORE HOTEL PARTNERS, LLC and S.B. YEN'S MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
YE et al v. BUSH
as 1:2008cv00991
Petitioner: NING YE, CHARLES TUN-CHENG YEN and JOSHUA HOPE
Respondent: GEORGE W. BUSH
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Type: Other Statutes None
Roger Lin, et al v. United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-5078
Plaintiff - Appellant: Roger C.S. Lin, Chien-Ming Huang, Chou Chang and others
Defendant - Appellee: United States of America

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?