Cases 101 - 110 of 146,525
Davide v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv02117
Plaintiff:
Matthew Davide
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Arch Specialty Insurance Company v. Ding Sheng Corporation
as 2:2024cv03583
Plaintiff:
Arch Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Ding Sheng Corporation
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Ruiz et al v. Fadmo Health and Homecare Agency Inc.
as 1:2024cv01969
Plaintiff:
Genesis Ruiz, Nohemy Arriola, Odilia Arriola and others
Defendant:
Fadmo Health and Homecare Agency Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Alcala v. CVS Caremark Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv03555
Plaintiff:
Luis Alcala
Defendant:
CVS Caremark Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01984
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Quishpe v. Manhattan Concrete, LLC
as 1:2024cv02027
Plaintiff:
Leonardo Quishpe
Defendant:
Manhattan Concrete, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03428
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03523
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Moultrie v. Cenlar
as 1:2024cv02012
Plaintiff:
ISAIAH MOULTRIE
Defendant:
CENLAR a/k/a CENTRAL LOAN ADMINISTRATION & REPORTING AS SERVICER FOR CITIBANK, Cenlar and Central Loan Administration & Reporting as Servicer For Citibank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
