Cases 61 - 67 of 67
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv06760
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Almeida et al v. The United States Department of Housing and Urban Development et al
as 7:2008cv04582
Plaintiff:
Robert F. Almeida and Robert F. Almeida
Defendant:
The United States Department of Housing and Urban Development and The Hon. Alphonso Jackson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Andrews International, Inc. v. New York CIty Housing Authority
as 1:2008cv01580
Plaintiff:
Andrews International, Inc.
Defendant:
New York CIty Housing Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Highgate House, L.L.C. v. Michelex Corporation
as 1:2007cv06417
Plaintiff:
Highgate House, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Michelex Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Terwin Advisors, LLC v. Dream House Mortgage Corporation et al
as 1:2007cv04831
Plaintiff:
Terwin Advisors, LLC
Defendant:
Dream House Mortgage Corporation and John Ponte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Valentine Properties Associates, LP et al v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development et al
as 1:2005cv02033
Plaintiff:
Valentine Properties Associates, LP and Park Properties Associates, LP
Defendant:
United States Department of Housing and Urban Development and Alphonso Jackson
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Export-Import v. ASIA Pulp & Paper, et al
as 1:2003cv08554
Garnishee:
Nusource Inc., Edgewood Paper Company, Inc., Corporate Express US Finance, Inc. and others
Defendant:
PT Pindo Deli Pulp & Paper Mills, PT Pabrik Kertas Tjiwi Kimia TBK, PT Indah Kiat Pulp & Paper TBK and others
Petitioner:
PAK 2000, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Export-Import Bank of The United States
Amicus Curiae:
Clearing House Association LLC
Undetermined:
Paper Max, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
