Cases 61 - 66 of 66
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. et al v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
as 1:2007cv05915
Plaintiff:
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. and others
Defendant:
Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. et al v. Taro Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv05914
Plaintiff:
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. and others
Defendant:
Taro Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. and Taro Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Shire, LLC v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. et al
as 1:2007cv03526
Plaintiff:
Shire, LLC, Shire, LLC and Shire, LLC
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. and Teva Pharmaceutical USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
The County of Orange v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
as 1:2007cv02777
Plaintiff:
The County of Orange, The County of Orange and The County of Orange
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Inc., Abbott Laboratories, Inc., Agouron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. et al v. CIPLA Ltd. et al
as 1:2007cv00316
Plaintiff:
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and others
Defendant:
CIPLA Ltd. and Byron Chemical Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. v. Invagen Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00315
Plaintiff:
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Invagen Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 183 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
