Cases 1 - 10 of 1,188
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv07169
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 (a) Complaint in the Nature of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06981
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706 (a) Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv07009
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06922
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 (a) Complaint in the Nature of Mandamus
Sultana v. Garland et al
as 7:2024cv06918
Defendant:
Director Ur Mendoza Jaddou, U.S. Ambassador Peter Haas, Merrick B. Garland and others
Plaintiff:
Shafin Sultana
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Drammeh v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2024cv06780
Plaintiff:
Ebrima Drammeh
Defendant:
Director, USCIS Ur M. Jaddou, Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas and Merrick B. Garland
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06725
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 (a) Complaint in the Nature of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06682
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06376
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06288
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
