Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Hines et al v. Erie County Community College et al
as 1:2012cv00941
Plaintiff:
Dashon Hines and John Doe; Jane Doe, et al
Defendant:
Erie County Community College, SUNY at Buffalo, State University of New York and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
University of Rochester v. Attachmate Corporation
as 6:2012cv06019
Plaintiff:
University of Rochester
Defendant:
Attachmate Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Niagara University et al v. Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
as 1:2011cv00075
Plaintiff:
Niagara University and Niagara University Ice Complex, Inc.
Defendant:
Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Niagara University et al v. Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
as 1:2011cv00077
Plaintiff:
Niagara University and Niagara University Ice Complex, Inc.
Defendant:
Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Niagara University et al v. Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
as 1:2011cv00076
Plaintiff:
Niagara University and Niagara University Ice Complex, Inc.
Defendant:
Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Clinical Insight, Inc. v. University of Rochester
as 6:2011cv06042
Plaintiff:
Clinical Insight, Inc.
Defendant:
University of Rochester
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Magnus Precision Manufacturing, Inc. v. TPS International, Inc. et al
as 6:2008cv06325
Plaintiff:
Magnus Precision Manufacturing, Inc. and Magnus Precision Manufacturing, Inc.
Defendant:
TPS International, Inc. and Universal-Automatic Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Daniels et al v. Momentus Solutions, LLC et al
as 1:2008cv00055
Plaintiff:
Edward J. Daniels and Ryan J. Daniels
Defendant:
Momentus Solutions, LLC, Universal Synergetic Inc., Technical Help In Engineering and Marketing and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
