Cases 61 - 70 of 115
Fox v. Warner Music Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv03707
Plaintiff:
Tatia Adams Fox
Defendant:
Warner Music Group, Inc. and Alternative Distribution Alliance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Phaneuf et al v. General Motors L.L.C.
as 1:2014cv03298
Plaintiff:
Lisa Phaneuf , Adam Smith , Mike Garcia and others
Defendant:
General Motors L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Star Funding, Inc. v. Action Contractors LLC et al
as 1:2013cv08326
Plaintiff:
Star Funding, Inc.
Defendant:
Action Contractors LLC, Thomas E. Brock, Sr. , Allison Amanda Sauls and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Broder v. Onewest Bank, FSB
as 2:2013cv05593
Plaintiff:
Adam Broder
Defendant:
Onewest Bank, FSB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Karhu v. Corr-Jensen Labs Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv03583
Defendant:
Corr-Jensen Inc., Corr-Jensen Labs Inc., General Nutrition Centers, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Karhu
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Jo Ness Enterprises, Inc. v. Adams et al
as 1:2013cv01240
Plaintiff:
Jo Ness Enterprises, Inc.
Defendant:
Pamela Adams and E.C.A. Realty Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Adam Developers Enterprises, Inc. v. Arizon Structures Worldwide, LLC
as 1:2013cv00261
Plaintiff:
Adam Developers Enterprises, Inc.
Defendant:
Arizon Structures Worldwide, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Wiener v. Cheris
as 7:2012cv09076
Plaintiff:
Matthew Wiener
Defendant:
Adam Cheris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Bin v. RYO Smokesmart, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv05603
Plaintiff:
Lin Bin
Defendant:
Corey Fischer, Paul Malcolm, Stacy Malcolm and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
MRP Acquisition, LLC v. Adams
as 2:2012cv00240
Plaintiff:
MRP Acquisition, LLC
Defendant:
Sean R. Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
