Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Nienaber et al v. Organon USA, Inc., et al
as 1:2013cv06900
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme, N.V. Organon and others
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Nienaber and Nathanael Nienaber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
McQuilling v. Merck & Co., Inc.
as 1:2009cv07256
Plaintiff:
Jean McQuilling
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Benes v. Merck & Co., Inc.
as 1:2009cv07255
Plaintiff:
Judy Benes
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hibbins v. Merck & Co., Inc.
as 2:2007cv05127
Plaintiff:
Carol A. Hibbins
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Newton v. Merck & Co., Inc.
as 1:2007cv10523
Plaintiff:
Mary Ellen Newton and Mary Ellen Newton
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Fruscione et al v. Merck & Co., Inc.
as 1:2007cv09334
Plaintiff:
Calogera Fruscione, Calogera Fruscione, Salvatore Fruscione and others
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Roy v. Merck & Co., Inc.
as 1:2007cv09335
Plaintiff:
Mary Roy and Mary Roy
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck & Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Chepilko v. Merck & Co., Inc.
as 1:2007cv04098
Plaintiff:
Sergei Chepilko
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Reinhardt v. Merck & Co., Inc.
as 1:2007cv05936
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Reinhardt
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Hatton v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation et al
as 1:2007cv01772
Plaintiff:
Lois A. Hatton, Lois A. Hatton and Lois A. Hatton
Defendant:
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation and Merck & Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
