Cases 41 - 50 of 54
Rice v. Associated Newspapers (U.S.A.) Limited
as 1:2017cv05270
Plaintiff:
J.C. Rice
Defendant:
Associated Newspapers (U.S.A.) Limited
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Pape v. LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv04925
Plaintiff:
Paula Pape
Defendant:
LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., LG Electronics MobileComm U.S.A., Inc., LG Electronics Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Moose Toys Pty LTD et al v. Dracco U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv01066
Plaintiff:
Moose Toys Pty LTD , Moose Creative Pty LTD , Moose Enterprise Pty LTD and others
Defendant:
Dracco U.S.A., Inc. and Dracco Company Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
RFA Holding Group LLC v. U.S.A. Dawgs, Inc.
as 1:2015cv08014
Plaintiff:
RFA Holding Group LLC
Defendant:
U.S.A. Dawgs, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Croak v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv07201
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. and Saatchi & Saatchi North America, Inc.
Plaintiff:
James Croak
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Freeplay Music, LLC v. Makita U.S.A., Inc.
as 1:2013cv05235
Plaintiff:
Freeplay Music, LLC
Defendant:
Makita U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Psihoyos v. LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc.
as 1:2012cv01485
Plaintiff:
Louis Psihoyos
Defendant:
LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Larson v. Leopard Films U.S.A., LLC
as 1:2011cv00503
Plaintiff:
David Paul Larson
Defendant:
Leopard Films U.S.A., LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
U2 Home Entertainment, Inc. v. Xinhua Bookstore U.S.A. Corp.
as 1:2009cv02428
Plaintiff:
U2 Home Entertainment, Inc.
Defendant:
Xinhua Bookstore U.S.A. Corp.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Diamond Head Music, Inc. v. Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc.
as 1:2009cv01024
Plaintiff:
Diamond Head Music, Inc.
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
