Securities/Commodities/Exchanges Cases filed in New York
Cases 91 - 100 of 757
Finger v. Continental Resources, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv09437
Plaintiff: Susan Finger
Defendant: Continental Resources, Inc., Harold G. Hamm, William B. Berry and others
Wilhelm v. LogicBio Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv09186
Plaintiff: Robert Wilhelm
Defendant: LogicBio Therapeutics, Inc., Richard Moscicki, Leon Chen and others
Stein v. Continental Resources, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv09181
Plaintiff: Shiva Stein
Defendant: Continental Resources, Inc., Harold G. Hamm, William B. Berry and others
Bushansky v. LogicBio Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv09145
Plaintiff: Stephen Bushansky
Defendant: LogicBio Therapeutics, Inc., Mark Enyedy, J. Jeffrey Goater and others
The Police & Fire Retirement System City of Detroit v. Argo Group International Holdings, Ltd. et al
as 1:2022cv08971
Plaintiff: The Police & Fire Retirement System City of Detroit
Defendant: Argo Group International Holdings, Ltd., Thomas A. Bradley, Scott Kirk and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Rubenstein v. Gad et al
as 1:2022cv08929
Plaintiff: Mark Rubenstein
Defendant: Thomas Gad
Nominal Defendant: Y-mAbs Therapeutics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 sv Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Scott v. EVO Payments, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv08600
Plaintiff: Robert Scott
Defendant: EVO Payments, Inc., James G. Kelly, Mark A. Chancy and others
Moore v. EVO Payments, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv08518
Plaintiff: Jon Moore
Defendant: EVO Payments, Inc., Rafik R. Sidhom, James G. Kelly and others
Dixon v. Covetrus, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv08120
Plaintiff: Brian Dixon
Defendant: Covetrus, Inc., Philip A. Laskawy, Deborah G. Ellinger and others
Waterman v. EVO Payments, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv08090
Plaintiff: Marc Waterman
Defendant: EVO Payments, Inc., Mark A. Chancy, Vahe A. Dombalagian and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?