Securities/Commodities/Exchanges Cases filed in New York
Cases 131 - 140 of 208
Braschuk v. Fibrocell Science, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv09915
Defendant: Fibrocell Science, Inc., Kelvin D. Moore, Julian P. Kirk and others
Plaintiff: Craig Braschuk
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. ยง 22
Gonzalez-Aldama v. Fibrocell Science, Inc et al
as 1:2019cv09659
Plaintiff: Eduardo Gonzalez-Aldama
Defendant: Kelvin D. Moore, Fibrocell Science, Inc, Julian P. Kirk and others
Briant v. Pivotal Software, Inc et al
as 1:2019cv09479
Defendant: Madelyn Lankton, William D. Green, Robert Mee and others
Plaintiff: Douglas Briant
Lamb-Fort v. Corindus Vascular Robotics, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv05779
Plaintiff: Ryan Lamb-Fort
Defendant: Corindus Vascular Robotics, Inc., Nathan R. Harrington, Mark J. Toland and others
Rauner v. Corindus Vascular Robotics, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv09056
Defendant: David W. Long, Corindus Vascular Robotics, Inc., Nathan R. Harrington and others
Plaintiff: Michael Rauner
Shea v. Corindus Vascular Robotics, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv08918
Defendant: Campbell D. Rogers, Corindus Vascular Robotics, Inc., Nathan R. Harrington and others
Plaintiff: Alec Shea
Bishop v. Venator Materials PLC et al
as 1:2019cv08625
Defendant: Douglas D. Anderson, Sir Robert J. Margetts, Russ R. Stolle and others
Plaintiff: Bonnie Yoon Bishop
Bruso v. Corindus Vascular Robotics, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv08536
Plaintiff: John Bruso
Defendant: Corindus Vascular Robotics, Inc., Nathan R. Harrington, David W. Long and others
Salinger v. Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv08122
Defendant: Douglas S. Ingram, Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. and Sandesh Mahatme
Plaintiff: Andrew Salinger
Lanzet v. Vical Incorporated et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv07528
Defendant: Richard M. Beleson, Gary A. Lyons, Robert C. Merton and others
Plaintiff: David M. Lanzet

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?