Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Ho v. Urovant Sciences Ltd. et al
as 1:2021cv00542
Defendant:
James Hindman, Pierre Legault, James A. Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Ho
Cisneros v. Urovant Sciences Ltd. et al
as 1:2021cv00735
Defendant:
James Hindman, Pierre Legault, MYRTLE POTTER and others
Plaintiff:
Claudia Cisneros
Kohler v. WPX Energy, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv10338
Plaintiff:
Pierre Kohler
Defendant:
Kimberly S. Lubel, Clay M. Gaspar, Richard E. Muncrief and others
Lewis v. Coty, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv09685
Defendant:
Pierre-Andrea Terisse, Lambertus Bart Becht, Pierre Laubies and others
Plaintiff:
Chris Lewis
Nominal Defendant:
Coty, Inc.
Garrett-Evans v. Coty Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv07277
Defendant:
Pierre-Andre Terisse, Pierre Laubies, Lambertus "Bart" Becht and others
Plaintiff:
Crystal Garrett-Evans
Chechele et al v. Laubies et al
as 1:2020cv03438
Plaintiff:
Donna Ann Gabriele Chechele, Mark Rubenstein and Revive Investing LLC
Nominal Defendant:
Coty Inc.
Defendant:
Pierre Laubies
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 sv
Placide v. Pierre et al
as 7:2020cv02277
Plaintiff:
Placide and Louis Bernard Placide
Defendant:
Pierre, Ruless Pierre, R. Pierre Consulting Group, LLC and others
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Pierre et al
as 1:2019cv10299
Defendant:
R. Pierre Consulting Group LLC, Ruless Pierre and Rules Pierre
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Ravansari v. Kapoor et al
as 1:2018cv07026
Defendant:
John N. Kapoor, Santosh J. Vetticaden, Patrick Fourteau and others
Plaintiff:
Hamid Ravansari
Nominal Defendant:
Insys Therapeutics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Almozairee et al v. Haddow et al
as 1:2017cv07245
Plaintiff:
Saleh Almozairee , Rani Abushaar , Oksana Akulova and others
Defendant:
Renwick Haddow, Zoia Kyselova, Bar Works Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
