Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Canders v. Forbes et al
as 1:2023cv00457
Plaintiff:
Tijuana L. Canders
Defendant:
David C. Forbes, Tracy Forbes and Raima Forbes
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Foster v. New York Daily News et al
as 1:2022cv02934
Plaintiff:
Tabatha Foster
Defendant:
New York Daily News, Tomas Tracy, Larry McShane and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Freeman v. Deebs-Elkenaney et al
as 1:2022cv02435
Plaintiff:
Lynne Freeman
Defendant:
Tracy Deebs-Elkenaney, Emily Sylvan Kim, Prospect Agency, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Cheng v. Shein Distribution Corp.
as 1:2021cv09414
Plaintiff:
Tracie Cheng
Defendant:
Shein Distribution Corp.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Cheng v. Olzem et al
as 1:2019cv06128
Plaintiff:
Tracie Cheng
Defendant:
Michelle Olzem and LEPASTELL LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Daily Harvest, Inc. v. eNaming.com LLC et al
as 1:2018cv10464
Defendant:
Does 1-10, eNaming.com LLC, Tracy Fogarty and others
Plaintiff:
Daily Harvest, Inc.
River Light V, L.P. et al v. Tracy Trading Inc., et al
as 1:2016cv04006
Plaintiff:
River Light V, L.P. and Tory Burch LLC
Defendant:
Tracy Trading Inc., and Wang Jian Zhou
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Manhattan Review LLC et al v. Yun et al
as 1:2016cv00102
Defendant:
Tracy Yun, Manhattan Enterprise Group LLC, Christopher Kelly and others
Plaintiff:
Manhattan Review LLC and Joern Meissner
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Slocum et al v. Slocum et al
as 6:2014cv06654
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Slocum and Tracy S. Arakelian
Defendant:
Ralph Slocum and Joshua Aymar Slocum
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Kaplan, Inc. et al v. Yun et al
as 1:2013cv01147
Plaintiff:
Kaplan, Inc. and MG Prep, Inc.
Defendant:
Tracy Yun and Manhattan Enterprise Group L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
