Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Mos Eisley, LLC v. Loverboy, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv07616
Defendant:
Kyle Cook and Loverboy, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mos Eisley, LLC d/b/a LOVERBOY and Mos Eisley, LLC doing business as Loverboy
Counter Defendant:
Mos Eisley, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 tr
Antetokounmpo v. Cook
as 1:2020cv06767
Plaintiff:
Giannis Antetokounmpo
Defendant:
Max D Cook and Max D Cook doing business as Courtside Attire
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Jasmaine v. J.M. Products, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv02714
Defendant:
Isoplus, LLC d/b/a Isoplus Hair Care, J.M. Products, Inc., Elite Pro Beauty and others
Plaintiff:
Cook Jasmaine
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Cook v. Lauren Conrad Beauty Co.
as 1:2019cv07174
Defendant:
Lauren Conrad Beauty Co.
Plaintiff:
Justin Cook
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Evriholder Products, LLC
as 1:2018cv06953
Defendant:
Art And Cook, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Evriholder Products, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Evriholder Products, LLC v. Art and Cook, Inc.
as 2:2018cv01788
Defendant:
Art And Cook, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Evriholder Products, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Evriholder Products LLC
as 1:2018cv01788
Defendant:
Art And Cook, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Evriholder Products LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Yang v. The City Cook, Inc.
as 1:2018cv02432
Plaintiff:
Stephen Yang
Defendant:
The City Cook, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Daisy Cook LLC v. Avon Products, Inc.
as 1:2011cv07606
Plaintiff:
Daisy Cook LLC
Defendant:
Avon Products, Inc.
Counter_claimant:
Avon Products, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Daisy Cook LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Pyatt et al v. Raymond et al
as 1:2010cv08764
Plaintiff:
Wadena Pyatt and Bang Hitz Publishing
Defendant:
Usher Raymond, IV, Alicia Augello Cook, Krucial Keys, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
